Not more than about a couple of months ago, the Greek government headed by the appointed technocrat prime minister Mr. Lucas Papdemos, a former Central Banker and Vice President of the ECB, signed the new loan agreement with the IMF/EU.
Now the terms of this loan agreement are tantamount to a total surrender of the Greek economy. Despite reassurances by the PM to the contrary himself in Parliament, the new bonds in the PSI swap are subject to British Law, instead of Greek Law, or even the Law of a Eurozone country such as Germany. This means that in the event of default the lender may seize assets of the Greek state uncontestedly.
Repayment of debt was given precedence over all and every other payment. Meaning that the needs of the Greek state such as schools, hospitals and everything else, can only be met after debt has been repaid (if there is anything left over). And as if all this were not bad enough, the targets set and means of attaining them are totally and completely unrealistic, meaning that although outright default had been postponed, it had been assured that it would happen a little further down the line.
Now the question is how and why did an experienced and intelligent man like our technocrat PM sign such a death warrant? Could he not see that default would come sooner or later? This is a particularly pertinent question in the light of the current Euro panic. It no longer seems like a question of whether Greece will default and leave the Euro but when. Traders are setting up shadow drachma trading desks, the atmosphere is rife with talk of how the return to the drachma will be effected and so on.
In the meantime, Euro apparatchicks and Politicians are all assuring that they do not want to see Greece leave the Euro. Others are saying that Greece should leave the EU altogether. Some are saying that the EU has buttressed itself in such a way that a Grexit (as it is so unaesthetically being called) can be easily withstood. Others, including the former President of the Commission Mario Prodi, say that a Grexit would be an unmitigated disaster and lead to the unraveling of the Eurozone altogether.
None of any of this came up before the Greek elections resulted in a resounding NO! to the German imposed barbaric and ruinous austerity. And the threats and terrorization are growing stronger the longer it is taking to agree to patch up some kind of government meaning that we may need to have a rerun of the election in about a month.
Now, the reason why it is proving impossible to form a government is that although almost 70% of the electorate voted for what are known as “anti memorandum” parties (that is against the terms of the savage austerity program), a flawed and undemocratic electoral law (legislated by the two major parties that have been running the show for the past 30 or so years), the first party gets a bonus of 50 seats out of the 300.
As a result, the two parties in favour of continuing the savage austerity package they signed up to have 149 seats, thus only two short of a majority. On the other hand, the remaining 151 seats include the Communist Party that refuses to join any coalition whatsoever, since it expects to instate a Soviet Republic in the resulting mayhem, and the Neo Nazi Party whom no one wants to work with in any coalition. Result: complete deadlock.
Hence the rising crescendo from Europe about Greece being headed straight for disaster, unless, it being implied, we change the way we vote! (The typical definition of Euro Democracy: Keep voting till you get it right. That is vote for the decision we have taken.)
Now here is the dilemma, if this is merely high stakes bluffing then it means that our PM signed up on all these disastrous terms because he was confident Greece would not be obliged to leave the Euro. But if all this is just bluster and bluff to intimidate the Greek electors on their way to the polls, then does that not mean we have an enormous bargaining chip in our hands, which means we can say no to the barbarous austerity after all?
On the other hand, given the impossibility of the actual terms of the loan agreement, default is inevitable unless they change. Germany and others are absolutely adamant that they cannot and will not be changed. Which means we are already half way out the door. If this is indeed the case then how could our PM have signed such a document amounting to a death warrant? Whose interests was he in fact serving? Those of Greece or those of the ECB whose Vice President he was until recently. And if so what does that mean? (And what might it mean for Italy whose PM is also an EU technocrat luminary?)
This has all gone way beyond a debt crisis. Greece has signed her sovereignty completely away not in return for a real bail out helping her to overcome her economic problems but in return for assured catastrophe. Disorderly default and expulsion from the Euro if not the EU altogether. Rumour has it that this is precisely what Germany wants and why it imposed such impossible terms, to get rid of that troublesome state completely, now that the EU has buttressed itself to withstand a Grexit.
What is the truth? Nobody tells us. We, the Greek electorate and all the peoples of Europe in one way or another, are constantly being fed lies and bombarded with threats to the extent that we have no real idea of where we stand and what is best for our country now that it has already been reduced to a pulp by the troika medicine which, as Yani Varouf;akis says, is not just a bitter medicine but a poison. That has worked its wonders, I would add.
So to all of our friends getting restless over the political gridlock in forming a government here in Greece and of what the hell will happen if we go back to the polls, the fundamental problem is: What are we supposed to believe and whom are we supposed to trust?


